What is the Hegelian Dialectic?

What is the Hegelian=20 Dialectic?

By Niki = Raapana and=20 Nordica Friedrich

October = 2005=20
=20

^Home=20

Introduction: Why study=20 Hegel?

"...the State 'has the supreme right against the = individual,=20 whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right = of the=20 world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian = William=20 Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third = Reich (1959, page=20 144)

In 1847 the London Communist League (Karl Marx and = Frederick=20 Engels) used Hegel's theory of the dialectic to back up = their=20 economic theory of communism. Now, in the 21st century, = Hegelian-Marxist=20 thinking affects our entire social and political structure. The Hegelian dialectic is the framework for = guiding our=20 thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined = solution.=20 If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our = perceptions of=20 the world, then we do not know how we are helping to implement the vision. When we remain locked into = dialectical=20 thinking, we cannot see out of the box.

Hegel's dialectic = is the=20 tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought = and=20 action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are = playing a=20 necessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity = into a=20 dictatorship of the proletariat. The synthetic Hegelian solution to all these conflicts can't be = introduced=20 unless we all take a side that will advance the agenda. The Marxist's = global=20 agenda is moving along at breakneck speed. = The only=20 way to completely stop the privacy invasions, expanding domestic = police=20 powers, land grabs, insane wars against inanimate objects (and = transient=20 verbs), covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, = is to=20 step outside the dialectic. This releases us from the limitations = of=20 controlled and guided thought.

When we understand what = motivated=20 Hegel, we can see his influence on all of our destinies. ... = Hegelian=20 conflicts steer every political arena on the planet, from the = United=20 Nations to the major American political parties, all the way down to = local=20 school boards and community councils. Dialogues and = consensus-building are=20 primary tools of the dialectic, and terror and intimidation are = also=20 acceptable formats for obtaining the goal. The ultimate Third Way agenda is world government. Once = we get=20 what's really going on, we can cut the strings and move our lives in = original=20 directions outside the confines of the dialectical madness. Focusing = on=20 Hegel's and Engel's ultimate agenda, and avoiding getting caught up in = their=20 impenetrable theories of social=20 evolution, gives us the opportunity to think and act our = way toward=20 freedom, justice, and genuine liberty for all.

Today the = dialectic is=20 active in every political issue that encourages taking sides. We can = see it in=20 environmentalists instigating conflicts against private property = owners, in=20 democrats against republicans, in greens against libertarians, in = communists=20 against socialists, in neo-cons against traditional conservatives, in=20 community activists against individuals, in pro-choice versus = pro-life, in=20 Christians against Muslims, in isolationists versus interventionists, = in peace=20 activists against war hawks. No matter what the issue, the invisible = dialectic=20 aims to control both the conflict and the resolution of differences, = and leads=20 everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts.

We're = definitely not=20 in Kansas anymore.

For a visual concept, see this simple chart [page now deleted] of = the Hegelian=20 Dialectic and Marx's Dialectical Materialism, posted by the Calverton = Private=20 School.

Definitions:

Merriam-Webster:

"Dialectic ....the Hegelian process of change = in which=20 a concept or its realization passes over into and is preserved and = fulfilled=20 by its opposite... development through the stages of thesis, = antithesis, and=20 synthesis in accordance with the laws of dialectical materialism = ....any=20 systematic reasoning, exposition, or argument that juxtaposes = opposed or=20 contradictory ideas and usually seeks to resolve their conflict=20 ...
....the dialectical tension or opposition between two = interacting=20 forces or elements."

"Dialectical Materialism ... = 1 :=20 the Marxist theory that maintains the material basis of a reality = constantly=20 changing in a dialectical process and the priority of matter over=20 mind."

Wikipedia:

"Hegel's dialectic often appears broken up for = convenience=20 into three moments called "thesis" (in the French historical = example, the=20 revolution), "antithesis" (the terror which followed), and = "synthesis" (the=20 constitutional state of free citizens). ... Much Hegel scholarship = does not=20 recognize the usefulness of this triadic classification for = shedding=20 light on Hegel's thought. Although Hegel refers to "the two = elemental=20 considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final = aim;=20 secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of = knowledge=20 and will, with its life, movement, and activity" (thesis and = antithesis)=20 he doesn't use "synthesis" but instead speaks of the "Whole": = "We=20 then recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of = Freedom, and=20 consequently as the objective unity of these two elements."=20 ...

"Hegel used this system of dialectics to explain the = whole of the=20 history of philosophy, science, art, politics and religion, but many = modern=20 critics point out that Hegel often seems to gloss over the realities = of=20 history in order to fit it into his dialectical mold....

In = the 20th=20 century, Hegel's philosophy underwent a major renaissance. This was = due=20 partly to the rediscovery and reevaluation of him as the = philosophical=20 progenitor of Marxism by philosophically oriented Marxists, partly = through a=20 resurgence of the historical perspective that Hegel brought to = everything,=20 and partly through increasing recognition of the importance of his=20 dialectical method. The book that did the most to reintroduce Hegel = into the=20 Marxist canon was perhaps Georg Lukacs's History and Class = Consciousness.=20 This sparked a renewed interest in Hegel reflected in the work of = Herbert=20 Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Ernst Bloch....

"Beginning in the 1960's, Anglo-American Hegel = scholarship has=20 attempted to challenge the traditional interpretation of Hegel as = offering a=20 metaphysical system." See Popular = Occultism

The Hegelian dialectical formula: A (thesis) versus B (anti-thesis) equals C = (synthesis).

For=20 example: If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of = freedom=20 then (C) neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a=20 slave.

The Soviet Union was based on the Hegelian dialectic, as = is all=20 Marxist writing. The Soviets didn't give up their Hegelian reasoning = when they=20 supposedly stopped being a communist country. They merely changed the=20 dialectical language to fit into the modern version of Marxist = thinking called=20 communitarianism. American author Steve Montgomery explores Moscow's = adept use=20 of the Hegelian dialectic in Glasnost-Perestroika: A Model Potemkin = Village.=20

How is it possible to consider a Hegelian=20 argument?

If the ideas, interpretations of experiences, = and the=20 sources are all wrong, can a conclusion based on all these wrong = premises be=20 sound? The answer is no. Two false premises do not make a sound = conclusion=20 even if the argument follows the formula. Three, four, five, or six = false=20 premises do not all combine to make a conclusion sound. You must have = at least=20 one sound premise to reach a sound conclusion. Logical mathematical = formulas=20 are only the basis for deductive reasoning. Equally important is = knowledge of=20 semantics, or considering the meanings of the words used in the = argument. Just=20 because an argument fits the formula, it does not necessarily make the = conclusion sound. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel knew this when he = designed his=20 dialectic.

Hegel is an imperialist con artist who established = the=20 principles of dialectical "no-reason." Hegel's dialectic has allowed=20 globalists to lead simple, capable, freeborn men and women back into = the=20 superstitious, racist and unreasonable age of imperial global = dominance.=20 National governments represent people who are free from imperial = controls over=20 private property, trade and production. National governments protect = their=20 workers from imperial slavery by protecting the worker's markets. But = if you=20 use Hegel's logical Marxism, the only way to protect people from = slavery is to=20 become the slave trader, just for a while. Twisted logic is why cons = are so=20 successful, and Hegel twisted it in such a way as to be = "impenetrable." Like=20 Hegel and Marx, the best street con knows his spiel has to use logic = to bend=20 and distort the story, and good cons weave their lies on logical = mathematical=20 progression. The fallacy is in the language, not in the math. = Detective=20 Phillip Worts' 2001 article Communist Oriented Policing is a nice = explanation=20 of Dialectical Materialism's influence on America.

The communitarian purpose for the Hegelian=20 dialectic

Hegel's theory is basically that mankind is merely a = series of=20 constant philosophical conflicts. Hegel was an idealist who believed that the highest = state of=20 mankind can only be attained through constant ideological conflict and = resolution. The rules of the dialectic means mankind can only reach = its=20 highest spiritual consciousness through endless self-perpetuating = struggle=20 between ideals, and the eventual synthesizing of all opposites. = Hegel's=20 dialectic taught all conflict takes man to the next spiritual level. = But in=20 the final analysis, this ideology simply justifies conflict and = endless war.=20 It is also the reasoning behind using military power to export an = illogical=20 version of freedom and false democratic ideals.

The reason we can = call it=20 the justification for modern conflicts and war, with impunity, is = because no=20 one can prove Hegel's theory is true. No matter how many new words = they make=20 up to define it, or how many new theories they come up with to give it = validity, we can prove beyond a doubt that it is all false. And, we = can show=20 the final equation in Hegels' Dialectic is:

A: The [your nation = goes=20 here] System of Political Economy (List 1841)
B: state controlled = world=20 communism
C: state controlled global communitarianism.

The Hegelian = dialectic is=20 the ridiculous idea that constant conflict and continual merging of = opposite=20 ideologies, as established by extreme right or left belief systems, = will lead=20 spiritual mankind into final perfection. (Americans understood man's = spiritual=20 quests to be outside the realm of government control). Hegel's = brilliance=20 rests in his ability to confuse and obfuscate the true motives of the=20 planners, and millions of people world-wide have been trying to make = sense of=20 why it doesn't work for over 150 years. But like the AA definition of=20 insanity, the world keeps trying it over and over expecting different = results.=20 ...

When Frederick Engels and Karl Marx based their communist = theory on=20 Hegel's theory of spiritual advancement via constant resolution of=20 differences, they based the theory of communism on an unproven=20 theory.

While Darwin's theory of evolution is still being = debated,=20 there's absolutely no proof that societies are continually evolving. = When=20 Engels and Marx later based their communist theory on Lewis Henry = Morgan's=20 theory of anthropology in 1877, they again based the theory of = communism on an=20 unprovable theory.

And when Amitai Etzioni used Hegelian reasoning to = base the=20 Communitarian Network on a "balance" between (A) Rights and (B)=20 Responsibilities, he built the entire theory of (C) communitarianism = on=20 nothing but disproven and unprovable unscientific = theories....

Already=20 gaining substantial ground against the Americans, British Marxism was=20 bolstered when Charles Darwin published his theory of human evolution = in 1859.=20 Engels, according to modern day scholars, seized upon Darwin's theory = to=20 substantiate communism:

"When Marx read The Origin of Species he wrote to = Engels that,=20 'although it is developed in the crude English style, this is the = book which=20 contains the basis in natural history for our view.' They turned = against=20 what they saw as the social, as opposed to the biological, = implications of=20 Darwinism when they realised that it contained no support for their=20 shibboleth of class oppression. Since they were slippery customers = rather=20 than scientists, they were not likely to relinquish their views just = because=20 something did not fit." (see: Marxism and Darwinism by Anton = Pannekoek,=20 1912.)

In 1877 Lewis Henry Morgan published Ancient Society, = or=20 Researches in Life, Lines of Human Progress from Savagery, through = Barbarism,=20 to Civilization. Then the "slippery" Engels seized upon Morgan's work = as the=20 constantly "evolving" basis for the totally unsubstantiated theory of = natural=20 social evolution into utopian world communism....

Hegel's = formula has=20 been so successful that in 2003 all U.S. domestic and foreign policy = is=20 dominated by "communitarian thinking," the whole country is living = under the=20 new laws, and yet Americans most affected by "impenetrable" Hegelian = laws have=20 never once heard the term used.

Conclusion:

The Hegelian dialectic presupposes the factual basis = for the=20 theory of social evolutionary principles, which coincidentally backed = up Marx.=20 Marx's Darwinian theory of the "social evolution of the species," = (even though=20 it has been used for a century to create a vast new scientific = community,=20 including eugenics and socio-economics), does not adhere to the basis = for all=20 good scientific research, and appears to exist mainly to advance = itself, and=20 all its sub-socio-scientific arms, as the more moral human science. To = the ACL=20 this means the entire basis for the communitarian solution is based on = a false=20 premise, because there is no FACTUAL basis that "social evolution of = the=20 species" exists, based as it is only on Darwinian and Marxist ideology = of=20 man's "natural" evolution towards a British version of utopia. =

The=20 London-Marxist platform in 1847 was "to abolish private property." The = American Revolution was based in private property rights. Marxist = societies=20 confiscate wealth and promise to "re-distribute it equally." America = promised=20 everyone they could keep and control what was the product of their own = labor.=20 Modern Marxist adherents openly claim they will "rebuild the world," = and they=20 train activist "change agents" to openly support overthrowing the = legitimate=20 governments of the world. Since their inception, Marxist agent = provocateurs=20 can be linked to every anarchist assassination and student uprising = that=20 caused chaos to the established European civilization throughout the = 18th and=20 19th centuries. Modern Americans have succumbed to the conspiracy = theory label=20 and will only listen to what the propaganda machines tell them. Now = our people=20 don't believe anyone other than maybe the Arab world "hates our = freedom." Most=20 modern Americans will never know what went wrong with their "great = experiment=20 in democracy."

While the Marxist-communitarian argument has not = provided a shred of evidence to prove their utopian vision, and their=20 synthesis does not match their own projected conclusions of world = justice, we=20 are convinced their argument does in fact substantiate our conclusion, = that=20 the entire philosophical dialectical argument is nothing but a = brilliant ruse.=20 We used to call it "a cheap parlor trick" until a responder to this = page=20 wondered how we could call it "cheap" when it's been so successful. = And he was=20 right. The dialectical arguments for human rights, social equity, and = world=20 peace and justice are a perfectly designed diversion in the defeated = British=20 Empire's Hegelian-Fabian-Metaphysical-Theosophical Monopoly game. It's = the=20 most successful con job in the history of the modern world. (For a = well=20 presented Christian overview of the con, see American Babylon: Part = Five-the=20 Triumph of the Merchants by Peter Goodgame.)

The communitarian=20 synthesis is the final silent move in a well-designed, quietly = implemented=20 plot to re-make the world into colonies. To us it doesn't matter if = there is=20 some form of ancient religion that propels the plotters, nor does it = really=20 matter if it turns out they're aliens (as some suggest). The bottom = line is=20 the Hegelian dialectic sets up the scene for state intervention, = confiscation,=20 and redistribution in the U.S., and this is against our ENTIRE = constitutional=20 based society. The Hegelian dialectic is not a conspiracy theory = because the=20 Conspiracy Theory is a fraud. We've all been duped by global elitists = who plan=20 to take totalitarian control of all nation's people, property, and = produce.=20 Communitarian Plans exist in every corner of the world, and nobody at = the=20 local level will explain why there's no national legal avenue to = withdraw from=20 the U.N.'s "community" development plans.

Appendix:

Check out Dialectics for=20 Kids!

Everything changes, and = Dialectics for=20 Kids explains how. If you are old enough to read, you can understand = change.=20 It's so simple even grown-ups can understand.    Please = choose:=20

The ABC's of Change - = Ages 4 and up=20

Popcorn, Earthquakes, = and Other=20 Changes - Ages 5 and up

Bit by Bit . . . Then = all at Once -=20 Ages 7 and up

Ten Ways You Turn = into Your=20 Opposite - Ages 9 and up  =20 [Emphasis added]

The Fabian Society of Australia explains = the=20 Hegelian-Marxist Third Way synthesis. "Re-inventing Collectivism: The = new=20 Social Democracy" by Mark Latham, Member for Werriwa Third Way = Conference,=20 Centre for Applied Economic Research, University of New South Wales, = Sydney,=20 12 July 2001:

"Over the past decade, a group of social democrats = have moved=20 down the reinvention path. They have developed a distinctive = political=20 project, exploring the new institutions and forums of a collective = society.=20 In the United States, Bill Clinton called it the Third Way. In = Britain, Tony=20 Blair has made it the work of New Labour."

Quotes that validate the ACL thesis that = communitarians IS the=20 synthesis in the Hegelian dialectic:

"People are living in a snarled-up subset of Marx's = thinking,=20 and do not know it. They twist logic to get to conclusions that will = suit=20 the current prejudices. They garnish it with a little Christianity = or=20 mysticism or whatever, though these play no important part in their = world=20 outlook." TRUTH OVERLOOKED: THE LEGACY OF LIST by Gwydion M. = Williams=20 (also available via Cal State LA-POLS 426 online reading list.)

"The Socialist Alliance programme is the foundation = upon which=20 everything else is built, including in time our exact organisational = forms=20 and constantly shifting tactics. The programme links our = continuous=20 and what should be all-encompassing agitational work with our = ultimate=20 aim of a communitarian, or communist, system. Our programme thus = establishes the basis for agreed action and is the lodestar, the = point of=20 reference, around which the voluntary unity of the Socialist = Alliance is=20 built and concretised. Put another way, the programme represents the = dialectical unity between theory and practice." [emphasis added] Posted by=20 Weekly Worker 368, January 25 2001. See also: "The transition = to the=20 communitarian system" in the same issue of the American Communist = Party's=20 Weekly Worker.

"The market economics of the Right and the = government=20 bureaucracies of the Left have weakened society's connectedness. = They have=20 not been effective forums for collective action. For Right-wing = politics,=20 this is not much of an issue. It has always believed in the = supremacy of=20 individual freedom and individual action. For the Left, however, it = is a=20 huge problem.
      "The old ideologies = positioned politics as a struggle for ownership, the historic battle = between=20 socialism and capitalism. The Third Way, by contrast, sees = politics=20 as an exercise in commun= itarianism:=20 rebuilding the relationships and social capital between = people. It=20 aims to put the social back into social justice. This is an = important=20 strategy for combating individualism and generating a sense of = collective=20 responsibility in society."
Australian Fabian Society, = "Re-inventing=20 Collectivism: The new Social Democracy" by Mark Latham, Member for = Werriwa=20 Third Way Conference, Centre for Applied Economic Research, = University of=20 New South Wales, Sydney, 12 July 2001

"In a passage that is = notable for its=20 vagueness, Azevedo says that the CEBs should be the basis for a new=20 communitarianism that rejects the two "bankrupt" models and systems = "that=20 are now polarizing the world," capitalism and Marxist socialism. = This=20 communitarianism is to be "a dialectical synthesis, a new creation,=20 superimposing itself on thesis and antithesis rather than retrieving = them."=20 The passage illustrates the controversy in Latin American = Catholicism=20 between those who continue to endorse the "third-position-ism" = (tercerismo)=20 of Catholic social teaching and those (including all liberation = theologians=20 that I know of) who believe that only socialism can be in accord = with=20 Christian values." Theology Today-Basic Ecclesial Communities in = Brazil:=20 The Challenge of a New Way of Being Church By Marcello deC. = Azevedo,=20 S.J.Washington, D.C., Georgetown University Press, 1987. 304 Pp.=20

Copyright =A9 2001-2005, Niki Raapana and Nordica = Friedrich. Website:=20 http://nord.twu.net/acl/st= andfor.html

Niki and Nordica are a = mother-daughter team=20 of researchers who have researched, observed and experienced the = sobering=20 realities and spreading dominance of communitarianism and its primary tool for change: the dialectic = process. Though=20 we agree with their analysis of the dialectic process, we can't = endorse all=20 their views.

     "We = love America=20 and the American people's spirit," wrote Niki. "My dad's motto = was=20 always, 'For God, country, and the 82nd Airborne!' Ours is: 'Stop=20 communitarian laws. The country you save may be your own.'" =

^{Home | =
Articles |}^Charts⁼^|=20^Victory⁼²⁰
=20 Email this=20 page