Top 10 Tips For = Traffic Court

Home
Articles
- Old Blog
- Excerpts
= Civil=20 Disobedience Spotlight
Forum
- Old Forum
Media
- Audio
  - NSP=20 Commercial Free!
  - In= terviews/Other
  - Call = of=20 Shame
- Video
Store
Links
Contact
Email = List
Chat

Newsflash

I'm now accepting Bitco= ins=20 for some purchases, check the store for = details. Also,=20 feel FREE to aid fellow "domestic = terrorists" with your contribution to the Adve= ntures=20 in Legal Land Wiki knowledge-base.

June 11, = 2011=20 [Saturday]: NSP = radio broadcast.=20 We'll be joined again by Dr. Judy = Wood,=20 author of Where Did the Towers Go? We're taking calls, so = listen=20 LIVE from 4-7pm est and call in at (218) 632-9399 with your = questions or comments about 911 and the = evidence.

October 21-23,=20 2011 [Friday to Sunday]: I will be speaking at Libertopia 2011 in sunny = San=20 Diego, California. We're also going to be = having the=20 1st annual, all voluntaryist BLUES JAM, including a head cutting = duel=20 between Greg = Diaz on=20 tenor sax, and Chris Case on guitar. I'll also be doing a = strength=20 & conditioning workshop.

Home \ = Articles \ Top 10 Tips For Traffic Court

Top=20 10 Tips For Traffic Court

Written by Marc Stevens = Tuesday, 28 August 2007 10:42

User Rating: 3D""=20

/&nb= sp;2=20
PoorBest

If you're unfortunate to have gotten a traffic ticket, keep the = following=20 tips in mind, your chances of getting it kicked out are much = greater:

1. Do not be argumentative.
2. Don=92t bring your own opinion or = arguments=20 to convince the judge.
3. Stick to the facts.
4. Repeat I am not = an=20 attorney I don=92t understand.
5. Don=92t object and press a = particular point=20 more than twice.
6. Stay on point.
7. Only accept responsive = answers to=20 questions.
8. Ask questions
9. Get judge and, or the prosecutor to = commit=20 to positions.
10. Use those positions/arguments against the judge or=20 prosecutor.
1. Traffic courts are scams run by people only = interested=20 in taking money. They are not in place to administer = justice. Being=20 argumentative only ensures you will be separated from your money. = Going in=20 thinking justice is being administered is to start off on the wrong = foot. =20 Any traffic court judge interested in administering justice would throw = out the=20 majority of traffic tickets within minutes of them being filed by the = police and=20 mail an apology to each defendant for their time wasted on the traffic = stop.

2. Traffic court judges don=92t care what we think, except = of course=20 what we think is the easiest and fastest way to pay the court = fine. We are=20 considered guilty the moment the cop decides to write the ticket. = Traffic=20 court is about making it look good and the judge is always going to be = perceived=20 as correct and you wrong. After all, he=92s judge. But, we = can get the=20 judge to contradict himself. If an argument or opinion is used, it = should=20 always be the judge=92s.

3. Sticking to the facts is the = fastest and=20 most effective way to demonstrate there is no case. Just asking a = couple=20 of questions is usually enough to have the only witness against you = declared=20 incompetent which requires his testimony, including the ticket, to be=20 stricken. Keep in mind that impeaching the only witness does not = mean a=20 judge will strike the testimony and throw the ticket out. =

4. =20 All non-lawyers are legally incapable of defending themselves and it is = unfair=20 to put someone on trial who does not understand the nature and cause of = the=20 proceedings against them. The more the judge explains about what = is going=20 on, the more can be used to make him contradict himself and prove there = is no=20 case.

5. This is related to number one. If I keep = pressing a=20 point the judge is only going to get angry and judges are notorious for = having=20 anger management problems. Remember, traffic court judges do not=20 care. One thing they care about is making the robbery look = good. =20 Don=92t help him make it look good.

6. Lawyers, with and = without=20 those flowing black robes, are masters of diversion. Never forget = their=20 goal is not getting to the truth and administering justice, it=92s about = getting=20 the money you worked hard to earn. If they get you off-point, they = win;=20 your attention on real issues is gone and before you know it the = proceeding is=20 over.

7. Only accepting responsive answers keeps = things on=20 point and works to destroy the appearance of a case. Beware = though, know=20 in advance what is responsive to the question. Bureaucrats are = very good=20 at giving what may appear to be responsive answers; they may sound good, = but=20 they are not responsive. A good example is =93Factually, what is = the=20 constitution?=94 and the bureaucrat answers with: =93It=92s the supreme = law of the=20 law.=94 It sounds impressive, but it=92s not responsive to the = question. =20 A responsive answer is devastating to a bureaucrat=92s case. I = have several scripts available I have used in court=20 successfully.

8. One tactic judges, lawyers and bureaucrats = use to=20 divert attention away from what they are doing is to accuse people of=20 =93arguing.=94 This is an attempt to make anyone in court look = bad, as if=20 we=92re the problem and not the traffic court. By just asking = questions, we=20 can point out we not arguing, just asking questions. From = experience, this=20 is very embarrassing for the individual accusing me of arguing. = Asking=20 questions is also incredibly effective at demonstrating there is no = case,=20 provided of course, we stay on point and only accept responsive=20 answers.

9. Traffic court judges do not care if you think they = have=20 violated the constitution or the law. But, because their main job = is to=20 make robbing people look good, traffic court judges do not like to = contradict=20 themselves. To do this, I ask questions to get the judge to commit = to=20 certain positions e.g., =93Am I entitled to be informed of the nature = and cause of=20 the charges and proceedings?=94 and =93Am I entitled to a fair = hearing?=94 =20 Because the very nature of traffic courts is unfair, it=92s easy to get = the judge=20 to contradict himself.

10. The judge=92s and prosecutor=92s = positions=20 can always be used to get them to contradict themselves later. As = with the=20 first question above, after a few more questions the judge will say, = =93I=92m not=20 here to answer your questions.=94 I just have to then remind him = he already=20 told me I was entitled to be informed. Also, by asking just a = couple of=20 questions, I=92ve had judges declare a witness competent, incompetent = and then=20 competent again in only a few minutes. By contradicting himself = like that,=20 all pretense of fairness is gone.

One of the most valuable pieces = of=20 information you can learn about traffic courts and bureaucrat attacks is = this:=20 A ticket/complaint is not synonymous with a case. = Of=20 course a traffic court judge will disagree with this, his object is not = truth=20 and justice, it=92s taking money away from people.

Remember, just = because a=20 cop writes a ticket does not mean he has presented a case before a = court. =20 No court has the =93legal=94 authority to proceed against someone unless = a case is=20 presented to it, this is just a short list of the =93authorities=94 = to prove=20 it. However, traffic court judges are interested only in getting = your=20 money, so things like the =93law=94 do not interest them. I = discuss this in=20 detail in my book Adventures in Legal Land, in several articles and on my radio show The No State Project. There are also archived = radio shows=20 I=92ve appeared on here and a new video series here about beating traffic tickets=20 .

Marc Stevens is an author, consultant and radio show=20 host. He is an expert on the nature of the court system, his=20 groundbreaking book Adventures in Legal Land rips the = veil of=20 legitimacy from the =93state=94 and exposes it for what it is, a public = relations=20 scheme. Using their own words against them, Marc Stevens proves = there is=20 no state. You can listen to his radio show The No State Project = live every=20 Saturday on We the People = Radio=20 Network.

Comments

+2 #=20 traffic =97 Jim=20 yario 2010-09-05 21:28=20

what would be the correct = answer to=20 (How many elements are in a valid cause of action)

Reply=20 | Reply=20 with quote | Quote=20

0 #=20 RE: Top 10 Tips For Traffic Court =97 = marquis 2011-05-07=20 10:36=20

hey marc i tryed what u = said and the=20 jugde arrested me for refusing to say i was the coorprite fiction now i = have to=20 go back on may 26 2011 for a failure to appear please help if u can sum=20 imformation would be good i feel so alone in this journey to peace im in = georgia=20 770 837 0469

Reply=20 | Reply=20 with quote | Quote=20

Refresh=20 comments list
RSS feed for comments to this post.

Add comment

JComments

Search

Login

RSS

=20 Syndicate this page

World's Shortest Political Quiz

Should a service or product be = provided at=20 the barrel of a gun?

	Yes=20
	No=20

=20 =20

The No State Project - Podcast

Full=20 Feed

Your Cart

Your cart is empty

Newsflash

Top=20 10 Tips For Traffic Court

Comments

Add comment

Search

Login

Most Viewed Articles

Most Viewed Videos

Most Viewed Shows

Most Viewed Interviews

Most Viewed Call of Shame

RSS

World's Shortest Political Quiz

The No State Project - Podcast

Your Cart